A suspected terrorist who spent years in a secret CIA prison should not be allowed to speak to a civilian attorney, the Bush administration argues, because he could reveal the agency’s closely guarded interrogation techniques.

Human rights groups have questioned the CIA’s methods for questioning suspects, especially following the passage of a bill last month that authorized the use of harsh — but undefined — interrogation tactics.

In recently filed court documents, the Justice Department said those methods, along with the locations of the CIA’s network of prisons, are among the nation’s most sensitive secrets. Prisoners who spent time in those prisons should not be allowed to disclose that information, even to a lawyer, the government said.

We are told again and again that our Crusade in the Middle East is founded on bringing democracy and freedom to that part of the world. Our government says they can only advance that crusade — by denying the very freedoms they purport to advocate.

“Improper disclosure of other operational details, such as interrogation methods, could also enable terrorist organizations and operatives to adapt their training to counter such methods, thereby obstructing the CIA’s ability to obtain vital intelligence that could disrupt future planned terrorist attacks,” the Justice Department wrote.

According to documents filed on his behalf by the Center for Constitutional Rights, Khan was arrested in Pakistan in 2003. During more than three years in CIA custody, Khan was subjected to interrogation techniques that defense attorneys suggest amounted to torture.

President Bush acknowledged the existence of the CIA system in September and transferred Khan and 13 other prisoners designated as “terrorist leaders” to the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Under a law passed last month, they are to be tried before special military commissions and may not have access to civilian courts.

The Justice Department argues that civilian courts no longer have jurisdiction to intervene in the case. They say keeping details about the CIA program secret is essential because national security is at stake.

National security, patriotism, all the holy excuses in the pantheon of fear are rolled out to defend the indefensible. Either we have a Constitution worth defending — or we don’t.

Or we won’t.



  1. Miguel says:

    So once a prisoner, forever a prisoner?

  2. FastJack says:

    If they’re not allowed to talk to an attorney then they will eventually talk to somebody else who is going to make those “secrets” public. The only way to prevent that from happenening is to kill those people. But then again I wouldn’t be too surprised about that, too.

  3. domc says:

    Where is the international community on this stuff? Where’s the weak U.N.? Where are the French? Where are the Swedes?

    Someone from outside the U.S. please do something. We can’t change it from within with the elite rich in power. America needs a slap upside the head and a kick in the balls.

    HELP!!

  4. ECA says:

    Wouldnt it be easier, to butter them up, make the comfortable, show them a better, easier way to live.
    Promise to bring their family over if they wish.
    then threaten to send them BACK if they dont tell us what we need.

    Its worked before.

  5. tallwookie says:

    they say if you’re a convicted felon, you lose certain rights
    I’d guess if the people in power think you’re a terrorist (or would like others to think you are a terrorist), you’d lose even more…

    Police state mentality, that…

  6. AB CD says:

    Why should they have a lawyer at all? They’re not going to be tried in court, which is the only time you have a right to an attorney.

  7. Pekuliar says:

    Don’t worry Ms. Nancy Pelosi will soon right this terrible wrong. In my opinion all enemy combatants should be read Miranda rights soon after capture. That way they could immediately see that we have the utmost concern for their health, safety and spiritual welfare. It is the only way to build a better world and other nations to see that we are not evil at heart. Shutting down this war could also pay a lot of lawyer fees. Maybe we could even get them a free college tuition program. I am sure our elite Universities would welcome them with open arms.

  8. TJGeezer says:

    #8 – Troll, troll, troll your boat…

    Don’t worry, right-wing assholes who, like our “president,” consider the US Constitution “just a goddamned piece of paper” are in power in all three branches. They control electronic voting outcomes. They keep media from doing exit polls to double-check the no-recount voting results. They own the judiciary with “nonactivist judges” who are willing to ignore the Constitution they swore to uphold and do whatever the administration’s version of the “justice” department wants them to do. Why bother trolling against the Constitutional conservatives you now brand as “liberals”? Hell, that word is so poisoned now I don’t even know what it means. Maybe it means people who don’t fall for the kind of crap being peddled by Pekuliar.

    Oh, wait. He’s just trolling. Too bad so many mouth-breathers think that kind of crap contains a level of oh, so threatening truth. Meh.

  9. DeLeMa says:

    #9. What’s a “mouth breather” ?

  10. martin cohen says:

    One of Bush’s principles: Conservation of Democracy!

  11. Mr. Fusion says:

    #9. What’s a “mouth breather” ?
    Comment by DeLeMa — 11/5/2006 @ 3:02 pm

    Someone who comments resemble #8.

  12. The other Tom says:

    The problem is not patriotism. Patriotism is a good thing. It promotes a sense of pride and a healthy community.

    The problem is increasing nationalism. We are only a few short steps away from Fascism now.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4560 access attempts in the last 7 days.