Ballbot and Ralph Hollis
Carnegie Mellon University researchers have developed a new type of mobile robot that balances on a ball instead of legs or wheels. “Ballbot” is a self-contained, battery-operated, omnidirectional robot that balances dynamically on a single urethane-coated metal sphere. It weighs 95 pounds and is the approximate height and width of a person. Because of its long, thin shape and ability to maneuver in tight spaces, it has the potential to function better than current robots can in environments with people.
“We wanted to create a robot that can maneuver easily and is tall enough to look you in the eye,” Ralph Hollis said. “Ballbot is tall and skinny, with a much higher center of gravity than traditional wheeled robots. Because it is omnidirectional, it can move easily in any direction without having to turn first.”
Ballbot has an onboard computer that reads balance information from its internal sensors, activating rollers that mobilize the ball on which it moves — a system that is essentially an inverse mouse-ball drive. When Ballbot is not in operation, it stands in place on three retractable legs.
Hollis noted that current legged robots, such as humanoids, are complex and expensive. He’s looking for simple alternatives to better understand the issues of dynamic stability for mobile robots in human environments. He believes that the research may produce a robot that could have useful, meaningful interactions with people who are elderly, disabled or need assistance in an office environment.
Read the whole article, especially all the good stuff about Ralph Hollis. He’s been at this forever — a founder of modern robotics.
Does it really do anything? It can’t even go upstairs.
Sounds great. Im amazed they got it to balance on that wheel.
Hmmmmm.
Needs a shiny metal ass.
Great bot… Perfect job: Paint road stripes…
Something to perform roadside executions for the GOP.
I’m surprised that Ballbot and Segway are not infringing on each other’s patents. The basic idea seems pretty similar. Or, are the differences between a “ball” and a “pair of wheels” enough to constitute different patents? The basic auto-correcting balancing using software and sensors idea is certainly simliar.
A three-balled robot would accomplish the exact same thing, would not need to balance, achieve the same results.
Three motors on top of three balls, it can move 360 plus rotate like a tank.
Add to that an articulated arm that goes up and down, plug into a paint gun, flexi-tubing, and you have the perfect painter.
Paint rooms and cars w/o human assistance.
EX-TER-MIN-ATE
They would not infringe on each other’s patents as long as they each use different algorithms in their software.
Interesting concepts. I’d lower the center of gravity and make it more like a weeble. Weebles wobble but they don’t fall down. By placing the heavy components in the ball and building a light frame it could be tall and look you in the eye. It would be more stable and could bend over and bounce back up.