I’m sure that using weird and Michael Jackson in the same sentence is rare, but here it is. The first story is about a woman claiming Jackson has been stalking her and tried to poison her.


Maybe she’s confused

Harris-Scott claims things turned ugly around 1987 when Jackson, who was “connected with criminals,” flattened her tires and tampered with her brake system. She also says a GPS tracking device was secretly installed in her car, tracking her every move. She says her phone was also wiretapped.

Harris-Scott claims it got even worse, alleging Jackson had “organized criminals watching me inside my house in L.A. and reporting to him.”

She is asking the court to order a public apology from Jackson and “immediate disconnection of all the surveillance and wiretapping equipment.” By the way, she also wants $100 million.

Then there is another lawsuit where a self-professed porn producer is suing Jackson for some breach of some contract. The kicker is that this guy claims Jackson is broke and strung out. Then what is he suing him for? Residue?

Marc Schaffel, a reputed porn producer and one-time Jackson confidant, seeks more than $3 million from the “King of Pop.” In his lawsuit, Schaffel also alleges the entertainer is broke and has had problems with drugs and lavish spending. Jackson’s representatives have denied the charges.

To make matters worse Jackson is also being sued by the Mom of two of his children. This is a custody battle that will keep Jackson in court even more.

Michael Jackson is now in another law suit twister! This time involving his own children!
Debbie Rowe, Micheal Jackson’s ex & mother of his children, claims that Paris, 8, and Prince Michael, 9, are not Jackson’s biological kids, but were conceived with the help of an anonymous sperm donor.
Now this could lead to Jackson losing two of his three children. Thus, they will be separated from their little four year-old brother, Prince Michael II, who was conceived by a different surrogate mother than his siblings.



  1. meetsy says:

    Who’s with me…lets get a class action suit against Michael for his bizarre nature, looks, and all the ink that’s wasted on him.

  2. PleaseThink says:

    We need to pass a law that after the end of this year no one else can sue Micheal Jackson. Everybody and their mother tries to sue him over something. I can’t believe the courts are even willing to hear these crazy cases. Now don’t you see and understand why he acts the way he does?

  3. meetsy says:

    Please,
    I thought he acted the way he does because his daddy opted for a secret castration to keep the cash cow giving milk, long past what would have been his son’s puberty. What else can account for Michael’s big burly, strapping brothers, and then HIM….with the 12 year old voice, the way tooo smooth skin, the lack of prominent adams apple, and other non-testosterone highlights. And, given that’s sort of the ultimate child abuse, it would explain his propensity to have surgeons carve his face to a skeletal mask, and all the OTHER weird freaky stuff.
    If anything he acts and looks like someone trapped in a strange limbo.
    As for people suing him…..uhhh, he’s an easy mark.

  4. RTaylor says:

    You heard it here folks, Michael is a castrato.

  5. Herbert says:

    # 3: You might not know that Michael Jackson even smokes cigarettes. That’s the real reason for his bizarness.
    This fully matches with the findings of the most-recent study from the American Cancer Society that a bare 30 minutes exposure to 2nd hand smoke will make you weird, inevitably, and active smoking (more than 2 cigarettes a day) may even result in an irresistible draw to cannibalism.
    Thank God (capitalized) that there are mothers and reputed porn producers who care! Beware of Michael Jackson! Save his childs!

  6. Rupert says:

    dont you think its getting too lame… every other person wants to sue jackson for $100 or so million… they just need a good lawyer and a well-cooked up story plus hire some men who’d secretly install ‘evidence’ that the prosecution would use.. and courts are willing to take the case… of course… everyone wants to make a buck out of jacko till he’s broke and can milk money out of himself…

    and the media did alot of unfair brainwashing over the past 5-7 years which changed the general opinion of jackson.. he was accepted by everyone in the united states as a pedo, molester and stalker even before the court convicted him guilty,,

  7. mike cannali says:

    1. Harris-Scott and Michael are apparently from the same planet
    2. Michael Jackson Porn films – a new catagory – “subteen”
    3. A new legal precident: “Rowe versus Wierd

  8. #7. he was accepted by everyone in the united states as a pedo, molester and stalker even before the court convicted him guilty,,

    Wasn’t he found innocent?

  9. David Duke is a malignant narcissist. says:

    David Duke is a malignant narcissist.

    He invents and then projects a false, fictitious, self for the world to fear, or to admire. He maintains a tenuous grasp on reality to start with and the trappings of power further exacerbate this. Real life authority and David Duke’s predilection to surround him with obsequious sycophants support David Duke’s grandiose self-delusions and fantasies of omnipotence and omniscience.

    David Duke’s personality is so precariously balanced that he cannot tolerate even a hint of criticism and disagreement. Most narcissists are paranoid and suffer from ideas of reference (the delusion that they are being mocked or discussed when they are not). Thus, narcissists often regard themselves as “victims of persecution”.

    Duke fosters and encourages a personality cult with all the hallmarks of an institutional religion: priesthood, rites, rituals, temples, worship, catechism, and mythology. The leader is this religion’s ascetic saint. He monastically denies himself earthly pleasures (or so he claims) in order to be able to dedicate himself fully to his calling.
    Duke is a monstrously inverted Jesus, sacrificing his life and denying himself so that his people – or humanity at large – should benefit. By surpassing and suppressing his humanity, Duke became a distorted version of Nietzsche’s “superman”. But being a-human or super-human also means being a-sexual and a-moral.

    In this restricted sense, narcissistic leaders are post-modernist and moral relativists. They project to the masses an androgynous figure and enhance it by engendering the adoration of nudity and all things “natural” – or by strongly repressing these feelings. But what they refer to, as “nature” is not natural at all.

    Duke invariably proffers an aesthetic of decadence and evil carefully orchestrated and artificial – though it is not perceived this way by him or by his followers. Narcissistic leadership is about reproduced copies, not about originals. It is about the manipulation of symbols – not about veritable atavism or true conservatism.

    In short: narcissistic leadership is about theatre, not about life. To enjoy the spectacle (and be subsumed by it), the leader demands the suspension of judgment, depersonalization, and de-realization. Catharsis is tantamount, in this narcissistic dramaturgy, to self-annulment.

    Narcissism is nihilistic not only operationally, or ideologically. Its very language and narratives are nihilistic. Narcissism is conspicuous nihilism – and the cult’s leader serves as a role model, annihilating the Man, only to re-appear as a pre-ordained and irresistible force of nature.

    Narcissistic leadership often poses as a rebellion against the “old ways” – against the hegemonic culture, the upper classes, the established religions, the superpowers, the corrupt order. Narcissistic movements are puerile, a reaction to narcissistic injuries inflicted upon David Duke like (and rather psychopathic) toddler nation-state, or group, or upon the leader.

    Minorities or “others” – often arbitrarily selected – constitute a perfect, easily identifiable, embodiment of all that is “wrong”. They are accused of being old, they are eerily disembodied, they are cosmopolitan, they are part of the establishment, they are “decadent”, they are hated on religious and socio-economic grounds, or because of their race, sexual orientation, origin … They are different, they are narcissistic (feel and act as morally superior), they are everywhere, they are defenseless, they are credulous, they are adaptable (and thus can be co-opted to collaborate in their own destruction). They are the perfect hate figure. Narcissists thrive on hatred and pathological envy.

    This is precisely the source of the fascination with Hitler, diagnosed by Erich Fromm – together with Stalin – as a malignant narcissist. He was an inverted human. His unconscious was his conscious. He acted out our most repressed drives, fantasies, and wishes. He provides us with a glimpse of the horrors that lie beneath the veneer, the barbarians at our personal gates, and what it was like before we invented civilization. Hitler forced us all through a time warp and many did not emerge. He was not the devil. He was one of us. He was what Arendt aptly called the banality of evil. Just an ordinary, mentally disturbed, failure, a member of a mentally disturbed and failing nation, who lived through disturbed and failing times. He was the perfect mirror, a channel, a voice, and the very depth of our souls.

    Duke prefers the sparkle and glamour of well-orchestrated illusions to the tedium and method of real accomplishments. His reign is all smoke and mirrors, devoid of substances, consisting of mere appearances and mass delusions. In the aftermath of his regime – Duke having died, been deposed, or voted out of office – it all unravels. The tireless and constant prestidigitation ceases and the entire edifice crumbles. What looked like an economic miracle turns out to have been a fraud-laced bubble. Loosely held empires disintegrate. Laboriously assembled business conglomerates go to pieces. “Earth shattering” and “revolutionary” scientific discoveries and theories are discredited. Social experiments end in mayhem.

    It is important to understand that the use of violence must be ego-syntonic. It must accord with the self-image of David Duke. It must abet and sustain his grandiose fantasies and feed his sense of entitlement. It must conform David Duke like narrative. Thus, David Duke who regards himself as the benefactor of the poor, a member of the common folk, the representative of the disenfranchised, the champion of the dispossessed against the corrupt elite – is highly unlikely to use violence at first.

    The pacific mask crumbles when David Duke has become convinced that the very people he purported to speak for, his constituency, his grassroots fans, and the prime sources of his narcissistic supply – have turned against him. At first, in a desperate effort to maintain the fiction underlying his chaotic personality, David Duke strives to explain away the sudden reversal of sentiment. “The people are being duped by (the media, big industry, the military, the elite, etc.)”, “they don’t really know what they are doing”, “following a rude awakening, they will revert to form”, etc. When these flimsy attempts to patch a tattered personal mythology fail, David Duke becomes injured. Narcissistic injury inevitably leads to narcissistic rage and to a terrifying display of unbridled aggression. The pent-up frustration and hurt translate into devaluation. That which was previously idealized – is now discarded with contempt and hatred. This primitive defense mechanism is called “splitting”. To David Duke, things and people are either entirely bad (evil) or entirely good. He projects onto others his own shortcomings and negative emotions, thus becoming a totally good object.

    Duke is likely to justify the butchering of his own people by claiming that they intended to kill him, undo the revolution, devastate the economy, or the country, etc. The “small people”, the “rank and file”, and the “loyal soldiers” of David Duke – his flock, his nation, and his employees – they pay the price. The disillusionment and disenchantment are agonizing. The process of reconstruction, of rising from the ashes, of overcoming the trauma of having been deceived, exploited and manipulated – is drawn-out. It is difficult to trust again, to have faith, to love, to be led, to collaborate. Feelings of shame and guilt engulf the erstwhile followers of David Duke. This is his sole legacy: a massive post-traumatic stress disorder.

    John 16:15 (King James Version)

    All things that the Father hath are mine:
    therefore said I, that he shall take of mine,
    and shall shew it unto you.

  10. debra denise shep,smith says:

    i believe in you.i alway have,always will.

  11. screechy_peach says:

    I’ve been maintaining that M.J was castrated since the late 80s when I lived in Aspen. Through the years, I’ve probably spouted my theory to hundreds of people, and until this week, I’d never heard anyone else mention it.
    To me, it’s obvious, but then again, to me it’s obvious that a jetliner didn’t crash into the pentagon, and the world trade centers were brought down by controlled demolition.
    Truth is cheap these days thanks to our consolidated media!


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4466 access attempts in the last 7 days.