Dr. Evil would have been so happy! He would have dropped the love bomb to get the troops, er, frisky, then followed it with the bad breath weapon just to be… evil. Of, course, he’d customize them with frickin’ laser beams!
US military pondered love not war
The US military investigated building a “gay bomb”, which would make enemy soldiers “sexually irresistible” to each other, government papers say.
Other weapons that never saw the light of day include one to make soldiers obvious by their bad breath.
The US defence department considered various non-lethal chemicals meant to disrupt enemy discipline and morale.
The 1994 plans were for a six-year project costing $7.5m, but they were never pursued.
The US Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, sought Pentagon funding for research into what it called “harassing, annoying and ‘bad guy’-identifying chemicals”.
The plans were obtained under the US Freedom of Information by the Sunshine Project, a group which monitors research into chemical and biological weapons.
‘Who? Me?’
The plan for a so-called “love bomb” envisaged an aphrodisiac chemical that would provoke widespread homosexual behaviour among troops, causing what the military called a “distasteful but completely non-lethal” blow to morale.
Scientists also reportedly considered a “sting me/attack me” chemical weapon to attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats towards enemy troops.
A substance to make the skin unbearably sensitive to sunlight was also pondered.
Another idea was to develop a chemical causing “severe and lasting halitosis”, so that enemy forces would be obvious even when they tried to blend in with civilians.
In a variation on that idea, researchers pondered a “Who? Me?” bomb, which would simulate flatulence in enemy ranks.
Indeed, a “Who? Me?” device had been under consideration since 1945, the government papers say.
However, researchers concluded that the premise for such a device was fatally flawed because “people in many areas of the world do not find faecal odour offensive, since they smell it on a regular basis”.
Captain Dan McSweeney of the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate at the Pentagon said the defence department receives “literally hundreds” of project ideas, but that “none of the systems described in that [1994] proposal have been developed”.
He told the BBC: “It’s important to point out that only those proposals which are deemed appropriate, based on stringent human effects, legal, and international treaty reviews are considered for development or acquisition.”
Gay bomb? Sounds like a Nude Bomb. (Any fans of the old GET SMART series and movies out there?)
J/P+?
WTF?
Actual time and thought went into this?
Again, WTF?
I was in the military…I was 19 when I went in. As a 19 year old I was beyond sexually aroused all the time. I was a walking erection. Now, I’m sure if you were to even triple or quadruple my sexual feelings back then, I’m sure I could still do my job and not just drop everything to have sex while being over-run by enemy troops. What are they thinking? If anything, it would make everyone on edge and trigger happy.
Think about it, do you want to run into a bunch of sexually charge/frustrated enemy with guns in their hands?
PHOTOSHOPED!!!!
(maybe dvorak still uses ms paint)
The REAL interesting thing, would to have a list of USED weapons, and what they do.
Mankind has been very inventive, and has even Improve Napalm…
You cant tell me that ‘computer shooters’ are any worse then what has already be done.
Donald Rumsfield = Dr. Strangelove
Neal Saferstein
3: Yeah, Rumsfeld looks a bit retouched.
I want one of those!!!!
Ah…not the Rumsfeld, the weapon.
I want one of those!!!!
Ah…not the Rumsfeld, the weapon.
A friend of mine says that whatever it was the goverment sprayed over San Fransico in the 50’s must have been the precursur of the gay bomb.
Oh those Clinton years and their crazy military plans!
I misread the article, it wasn’t just the Clinton Administration’s idea, but it was first started in 1945.
I have never heard a marine turn down a BJ, not that I’m slutty or anything…
The basic idea of a disruptive, rather than destructive, bomb is okay, but the suggested applications border on childish. Why not just mark the enemy with a slightly radioactive substance. You could easily pick the enemy out “when they tried to blend in with civilians” and the technology already exists.
Just make them Sailors, and put them on the seas for 1 year…
It would be interesting to have a REAL, international Passport system.
Each one is registered into a computer, and we can do REAL background checks, useing facial/retinal ID of WHERE int he world these folks came from. Insted of letting 1/2 the world wonder around into OTHER coountries, and getting a passport from places they WERENT BORN.
Those that COULD come in from Canada, or mexico, COULD be traced back to their origins, unless they walked 5 countries away.
I can see why all these alternatives to killing were nixed; they don’t spread blood, body parts and human feces all over the landscape. In other words, if it doesn’t kill then we don’t want it.