Ecosystems containing many different plant species are not only more productive, they are better able to withstand and recover from climate extremes, pests and disease over long periods, according to a new study. It is the first experiment to gather enough data–over a sufficient time and in a controlled environment–to confirm a 50-year scientific debate about whether biodiversity stabilizes ecosystems.

Biodiversity of global ecosystems has decreased as global population has increased, said Tilman, because diverse ecosystems such as forests and prairies have been cleared to make way for agricultural fields, buildings and roads.

The research shows that ecosystems containing many different plant species are more productive than those containing only one species. A return to biodiversity may prove to be the key, Tilman and his colleagues believe, to meeting energy needs for the growing number of people on the planet and for restoring global ecosystems.

“Diverse prairie grasslands are 240 percent more productive than grasslands with a single prairie species,” Tilman said. “That’s a huge advantage. Biomass from diverse prairies can, for example, be used to make biofuels without the need for annual tilling, fertilizers and pesticides, which require energy and pollute the environment. Because they are perennials, you can plant a prairie once and mow it for biomass every fall, essentially forever,” Tilman said.

The research was carried out in 168 plots, each of which was randomly planted with one to 16 perennial grasses and other prairie plants. Stability of plants in the plots depended upon diversity and root mass. Roots store nutrients and buffer against climate variations. Perennial prairie plants have far more root mass than crops such as corn, which must be replanted annually.

Interesting study — especially as alternative fuels begin to reach the marketplace. Signs went up on I-25 in my neck of the woods, recently, directing travelers to local service stations offering E85.

Especially useful is that these folks considered energy consumption and pollution from the whole process.



  1. Locke says:

    Weird, but pretty predictable.. If there are more animals for others to prey on, then their more likely to survive…

    Also: Add Cagematch link to side pannel.
    And finally, (as I couldn’t find cagematch link)
    while I was browsing through dvorak, a friend of mine came over to look at what I was doing, and then claimed that this was the source of a virus!
    I inquired as to why he thought that , and he showed me the following (screenie)

    http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/6792/untitled27lz.gif

    Apperently thats a very popular chain letter running around on a (super)massive forum called “Gaia Online” which claims to be the largest online forum in existance!
    Looks like your pretty famous Dvorak!

  2. Uncle Dave says:

    Um, Locke. Check the graphic to the left and just above your comment.

    As for the virus, that’s how John works off his crankiness!

  3. ECA says:

    there is another contention, about the use of chemicals to grow things, over the mother nature way..
    Letting TIME put the vitimins and minerals into the plant, or if adding them to the soil, works best..

    Once you look at ALL the chemicals that they add to the soil, herbicides, pesticides, and then the Vitimins and minerals…
    THEN discover the the 2 MAIN pesticide that have been used for 40 years, deazinon and seven, have been removed for causing long term problems.. It gets REAL scary.

  4. GreyWolf says:

    Wow, what an awesome and groundbreaking discovery (sarcasm). I thought this was a known fact, but surprise surprise. Mixed forest types for instance are much more “healthy”, hence more productive. Untouched nature is a very diverse ecosystem. The diversity is there for a reason, if we take it away (man-made forests with few species), the natural bio-network will brake (won’t build up at all). This leads to weaker plants and wildly spreading pests.
    It seems that scientists just think too much, instead of opening their eyes and taking a good look at mother nature.

    GreyWolf

  5. moss says:

    GreyWolf — regular visitors here are aware of a certain small percentage of Commenters who still need convincing that science offers a better education about reality than does superstition. Like the majority of Americans who still believe the Earth is flat and Jove created Darwin’s mom.

    If I read the bold bits correctly, there also seems to be a point about more efficient production of biofuels.

    Or are you simply trying to qualify as a cranky geek?

  6. ECA says:

    its as I stated…above..
    You cant keep growing in 1 spot without abit of diversity.. Even crop rotation comes to an end.

    http://www.mamashealth.com/nutrition/enrich.asp

    Its a strange fact, that the wheats and grains we have today, were around 1000+ years ago, but they are not the same ones in the WILD today.

    And it would be interesting to grow a REAL bio diverse crop. Have 3-6 different plants growing at the same time, supporting each other.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4454 access attempts in the last 7 days.