Pamela Anderson, proof that all Cancers aren’t bad.
Karolinska Institutet – 2006-03-21:
Scientists at Karolinska Institutet in Sweden have helped to identify a molecule that can be used as a vaccination agent against growing cancer tumours. Although the results are so far based on animal experiments, they point to new methods of treating metastases.
The researchers have identified a short peptide molecule that the T cell in the study recognises. Using this peptide, the researchers can vaccinate and protect against the spread of tumours from different tissues, including melanoma, colon cancer, lymphoma, and fibrosarcoma.
[editor’s note: I want to formally apologize to the readers of this blog for some of our images. It appears that the various contributing editors are engaging in a moment of one-upsmanship. Well, actually it’s two-upsmanship technically. We should resume our regular programming shortly. Again, I’m sorry.]
Is this “National Post A Scantily Clad Woman On Your Blog” day or something? I must have missed the memo.
But this makes 3 stories in a row now.
But hey, good times right?
Um…Is silicone a form of cancer?
But, hey, love the pic!
Its a trend. Look at Vanity Fairs hollywood edition. I think we are entering a scantily clad phase. I for one, welcome our inflatible overlords. Is the one in the middle her head?
Yeah, there should be a rule in plastic surgery: Never make your boobs bigger than your head.
I mean, if you’re going for fake breasts, at least TRY to make them look natural.
Well, ya got my attention. Oh ya, yeah for a cancer cure.
garym :- She was born July 1st. (she is Canada’s centennial baby) so her sign is Cancer.. hence the joke
Spring = Scantily clad phase
Is it really news that somebody has found a promising cure for cancer that hasn’t been tested on people yet? Slow news day? Found a picture and needed an article to go with?
“Yeah, there should be a rule in plastic surgery:”
My rule on breast sizes is that they can be as big as gravity allows. In other words if they’re drooping or stretching, they’re too big.
Miss Anderson’s don’t seem to violate my rule, so I give ’em a big… er… thumbs up.
All of these chick pictures are getting me in trouble at work. Love the blog John… Hate getting in trouble for opening your page!
Carl, I suggest using Firefox and PrefBar. When I visit this site at work I just turn off images.
I do the same thing with Fark and Something Awful, among others.
Hot chick day at Dvorak.com/blog?
The women of the crab are hot ,take it from a fish they will eat you alive.
Dear Chesty:
How about a little eye candy for the hetero females once in a while? Since I have got my own perfectly lovely pair of breasts all to myself whenever I want, tossing a treat to the 0.68% of your audience that is like me doesn’t seem so much to ask. Hey, we pay the bills! We shop online! We click the ads! or whatever.
Beefcake – KB? Dave? Bueller? Steve?
I await with baited breath.
Very truly yours,
A.
AM, I can’t do much for you. But how about a picture of Jobs wearing a french maid costume that I was going to use for an earlier posting?
PLEASE resume your regular programming ASAP!!! Nobody enjoys pictures of Hot Chicks more than me, but posting cartoonishly vivisected over-the-hill bimbos like this does not qualify as hot-chick posting.
At least you could have included the bicycle pump she uses on her “breasts” (what little of those tumors are actually “breast” tissue) and lips in the photo. Sheesh. Good thing I already ate dinner. I’d lose my appetite.
As to the “gravity” rule….you make the rubber hard enough, they could be the size of watermelons and still not droop. And hers are getting close. Yuck!!!
“ou make the rubber hard enough, they could be the size of watermelons and still not droop”
Like I’m ever going to get a chance at touching them anyway! If all I get to do is look, then “hardness” plays no factor in size.
>>Like I’m ever going to get a chance at touching them anyway! If all I get >>to do is look, then “hardness” plays no factor in size.
Perhaps not. They’re still grotesque, cartoonish, and disgusting. If size is all that matters, why not keep working the bicycle pump until they’re the size of yoga balls? Nothing that is as artificial-looking as these monstrosities is even remotely appealing. She looks like a blow-up sex doll, but with a little less intelligence.
“She looks like a blow-up sex doll, but with a little less intelligence”
I’m trying to figure out how that’s a bad thing?!
>>I’m trying to figure out how that’s a bad thing?!
Uhhh, unless you’re a drunken frat boy, you need to upgrade your taste in women, dude.
Mustard, I realize that in the real world super-sized breast are disgusting. Droopy. Veiny. Stretched out. Yeck!
But in fantasy, anything is possible.
SN, I find freakishly engorged mammary glands to be the utmost in appetite suppressants. Not even attractive in some soft-core porn anime context.
And this is not “fantasy” or soft-core porn anime, this _IS_ the real world. Pamela Anderson paid some plastic surgeon vast sums of money to pump gallon after gallon of silicone rubber into her jugs. And those lips? Ewww. I’d just as soon kiss a folded-over mountain bike inner tube.
It’s one thing for a cartoonist to draw something like that. After all, if Dumbya can look like a gargoyle, why couldn’t a real cartoon human have hooters the size of basketballs and lips the size of bratwursts? But to think that someone would willingly inflict that upon themselves makes me pessimistic about the future of humanity.
“And this is not “fantasy” or soft-core porn anime, this _IS_ the real world. Pamela Anderson”
But it is fantasy. I will NEVER get to see Miss Anderson or her boobies in the real world. And even the picture above was undoubtedly touched up.
I agree with you and I have agreed with you: In the real world they are probably disgusting. But in the picture above, they are perfect. (Mostly because we don’t really see them, and what we do see is airbrushed or photoshopped!)
Do you have a Facebook like button? I would really like to vote up this page!