A copy of George Deutsch’s resume?

Seattle Post-Intelligencer – February 13, 2006:

Talking yourself up to a prospective employer is a time-honored tradition. But come this summer, inflating your resume could be downright illegal.

State legislators are considering a bill that would subject people to a $1,000 fine for claiming in writing to have an academic degree they don’t really have or failing to disclose that a listed degree came from an unaccredited institution.

The bill passed the House last week and now goes to the Senate.



  1. Jon says:

    Good, talking oneself up and making up facts are two different things.

  2. James says:

    I am big on honesty, this sounds reasonable although like libel, the line between exaggeration and lying can be nebulous in many cases.

    I would like to see the same go for employers: if they advertise a job, say development, and then have you do something else, there should be a fine as well.

  3. Where are these places that degrees make a big difference? Sure make it illegal to claim one, but given how much they seem to be worth, I can’t see much point.

    I have 2 engineering degrees from a genuine, accredited institution, and they don’t seem to be worth a warm cup of spit. If you can’t show 4 years of .NET, ASP.NET and Java, then don’t let the door hit you in the ass on your way out.

  4. Chris Alef says:

    Do we really need a law for this? Honesty is the expected norm for everybody. Is it really necessary to enforce this with a criminal fine given that we handle this just fine in society by firing such liars.

    2 cents from a Washington State resident.

  5. cheese says:

    Several years ago I read 30 resumes for a job we had posted. I sensed most of the applicants had lied about their work experience and so-called “skills”. My staff and I created a very simple test covering tasks our future employee would perform. Each and every one of the applicants miserably failed our tests. Unfair test? The hardest task was to perform a simple mail-merge. None were able to perform this task and EVERY applicant claimed proficiency! We ended up promoting and training from within.

    So do we need a law? I think not but I well understand the temptation…

  6. Floyd says:

    Cheese, my resume’ is for real, but it still hasn’t got me hired yet after 6 months. Why? Don’t do Java, and haven’t got 4 years experience in .Net. Nevermind that VB.Net is similar enough to VB 6 that a Microsoft utility can do the initial conversion (except for things like array bounds other than 0 to n).

  7. i agree with the policy,
    Adding degrees you don’t have is out right fraud.

  8. Darden Mcglothlin says:

    An interesting part of faking a resume and getting caught is that once one is convicted the evidence is public information. All the resume information would be available using Google or LexisNexis. Would anybody seeking a job want that sort of exposure? Any savvy HR Department could run a search cross-referencing a few items in the resume and see the conviction. Bad times for the faking risk taker!

  9. Pat says:

    cheese

    I understand your need for a test. I don’t know the position you were hiring for, but I assume it was for a secretary. I consider myself proficient in WORD, good in Excel and passable with difficulty in PowerPoint. I have never done a mail merge because I have never needed to do one. Give me a half hour to figure it out or give me a ten minute demo and I’ll have it. WORD is such a large program with hundreds of uses that it is quite possible to be very good at it but still not know everything. Anytime I had a 100% failure rate, I would certainly check out the test to see if it was fair and objective.

    I agree though that promoting from within is a better plan. First, you already know the person’s personality, attendance, and capabilities. Second, the person already knows you and your needs, the job environment, and their co-workers.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 5803 access attempts in the last 7 days.