United Press International – Feb. 8, 2006:

Craigslist faces a lawsuit from a fair house group in Chicago, accusing the Web site of allegedly publishing discriminatory advertisements.

The case could test the legal liabilities of online ad venues as housing watchdogs want to hold online classified sites to the same standards as publishers of print classifieds, reports the Chicago Tribune.

Craigslist’s Chief Executive Officer Jim Buckmaster says full screening of its vast classified listings, which range from babysitters seeking work to those selling tickets for baseball games, would be “physically impossible,” the report said. He says the site doesn’t pre-screen or approve new ads, which number about 8 million each month.



  1. site admin says:

    Does anyone but me think that perhaps the Chicago Tribune is actually behind this suit?

  2. MacG says:

    Meritless –> probably

  3. Paul says:

    it’s no big deal to run a robot that would flag the emails with (expandable) list of ‘bad’ keywords.

    if craigslist would do that they would have no problem protecting themselves (so the robot would have bugs – no big deal) .

    Position “it is impossible” is *very* lame.

  4. Improbus says:

    In the business world impossible == to expensive and it is pretty lame.

  5. Adam says:

    To Paul:

    Roommate needed. Nice 3bdrm apartment on Black Currant Road. A great neighborhood with lots of culture: Mexican Markets, and many gay and lesbian friendly business in the area.

    Roommate needed. Not interested in you if youare Black, Mexican, gay or lesbian.

    Blacklists are stupid and don’t work.

  6. Mike says:

    shouldn’t be a federal law in the first place. should be the province of the states — see 10th amendment.

  7. moss says:

    Newspapers have had this sort of thing automated for years. Perish the thought some peon intern gets to do the final skim, right. You just set standards for read/filter for the ads to meet in the first place.

    If your ad doesn’t get published, that’s YOUR problem.

  8. for an update, please check my blog, cnewmark.com

    thanks!

    craig

  9. Jon says:

    It’s people looking for roomate, of course they can specify what they are looking for. Some of them maybe racist or whatever, but that’s really not up for Craiglist to judge.

  10. raindog says:

    Moss, your analogy fails because there is no newspaper on the planet that publishes 8 million classified ads per month.

    The idea of treating a completely automated online classified site like an old-school newspaper is as lame as AOL/Yahoo/Goodmail trying to treat e-mail the same way as snail mail.

  11. Paul says:

    To: Adam.

    1. My posting was *not* about possible efficiency of block lists. Try re-reading it?

    2. Block list per se can not provide 100% quality.
    Block lists + typing monkey can provide 100% quality.

    3. Nevermind.

  12. Will says:

    Which would be better. an add for “Room mate needed” specificaly states no black/gay/jewish room mates because he is a KKK member or just an add that says “needs one one room mate”. Why would you want to live with someone like that. The first add lets you know, screw that guy he hates me, why would i want to live with him? “Well maybe by living with him the impossibly unlikely room maters will make a change for the better” then they can sell their script to LifeTime and make a crappy TV movie.

    I know i would not want to live with someone who hated me just for my background.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 5803 access attempts in the last 7 days.