Confessions of a College Journalist – Why aspiring writers should be allowed to fail in private. By Bryan Curtis — As someone who wrote for both high school and college newspapers before there was an Internet I found this point (cited below) to be an interesting observation. The longer your opinions are in the public domain and ready for searching, the more contradictions will be found. Nobody fully understands what this means to the future of journalism. But it means something!

College newspapers have gone digital, and with that we’ve lost something vital about college journalism: the privilege to write wretchedly, irresponsibly, and incoherently in relative privacy. “When you screw up now, it’s Google-able,” says Christopher Buckley, the editor of Forbes FYI and a veteran of the Yale Daily News. “In the old days, you just had to wait three days and no one would remember.”



  1. Rob says:

    Horray for the internet. I like this about digital archives. We depend on the media to give us honest, current up to date news (or a somewhat facsimilie of it) (Becasue we are either to lazy or just unable to reaserch it ourselves).

    I do not recall the journalist who was fired from the NYT, but he should have never been able to write a book or gain meaningful employment in the industry again. News should not be conservative or Liberal….Just news. And if we have a weapon to help hold the media accountable…So much the better…

    Fox news has one thing right…. The media should just report….And WE should decide….

    How informed we are to use the information correctly is another matter altogether but yes is just as improtant.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 11605 access attempts in the last 7 days.