GANDALF has developed a groundbreaking technique to increase data rates by a thousand-fold compared to existing DSL and a hundred-fold compared to WiFi. The technology also allows data to flow seamlessly over both wireless and fixed-line communications, making the project the only initiative in the world to progress so far in both areas.

“Why not use the same technology for both fixed-line and wireless? That was the fundamental question that drove the project,” explains GANDALF coordinator Javier Martí in Spain. “We also saw the need to address the additional challenge of obtaining high rates of data transfer – exceeding 1 gigabit per second – over both cable and radio.”

“The major advantage for operators is that the cost of implementing GANDALF is minimal,” Martí says. “We estimate that it would not cost more than say 50,000 or 60,000 euros to implement it across an entire network, which is peanuts for operators.”

Most significantly perhaps, the system would give operators access to more clients without having to undergo costly public works projects to lay new fibre optic cable. Existing cable could be used to relay data to the closest access node to clients’ homes before being converted into a wireless signal.

In areas where both fixed-line and wireless accessibility exists, the GANDALF system offers additional advantages. “The duality of the communications channels increases reliability,” the coordinator notes. “For businesses or public administrations this is particularly important. Banks and other companies carry out a process called disk mirroring, for example, where they copy the databases from all their branches. Lost connectivity during mirroring can cause major problems but with dual connectivity the reliability is greatly increased.”

With the GANDALF technique, data transmissions switch seamlessly between fixed-line and wireless. “It is completely transparent to users,” Martí notes.

Similarly, the system can also be used to connect two fixed-line local area networks by radio without the need for new fixed infrastructure, something that the project partners are currently testing at the campus of the Technical University of Valencia. The same site will also be used for other field trials before the project ends in December.

In-lab tests have so far achieved a data transfer rate over both fixed-line and wireless of 1.25 Gb/s and the project partners are currently studying other capabilities of the system.

“The technology is here and it works, the only thing remaining is standardisation, depending on how well that goes I imagine a product will be on the market within a year from now,” Martí says. “So in the coming years you can expect, with confidence, that many companies will start using this technology and many people will be receiving data over it in their homes, probably in Spain through [Spanish cable operator] ONO at first and then across the rest of the world.”

Except the USA, of course. You wouldn’t to upset the Telcos, cable operators and anyone else the FCC serves as flunkey.



  1. Andrew says:

    Why wouldn’t the telecomm and cable companies want this? If they rolled out this service everyone in America would sign up for it. They could even raise the rates if they wanted-I for one wouldn’t mind paying $60 a month for a gigabit connection.

  2. Tomas42064 says:

    I miss TechTV.
    It was a great television channel for cable or satellite viewing.
    Why it was sold and why they changed is par for the course of bubblehead executives who purchased the site.
    They probably should have named it UPSKIRT TV instead of G4.
    Somebody please get us a great professional Tech TV Channel.
    The original was great.

  3. Eideard says:

    Well, Comcast, right now, gets away with $60/month for 3.5 mbps. Why would they want to change? Their competition — like Qwest — wants $30/month for 1 mbps plus you have to pay an ISP.

    Even if they weren’t proportionate increases, they’d likely want $300/month for gigabit service. It’s cheaper to own politicians and stop someone else from offering an alternative.

  4. Bombadil says:

    Oh wow! A project nobody has ever heard of has found a way to increase data throughput by two to three orders of magnitude through the same spectrum over disparate media. What have them science boys been doing with those fancy research grants given by the government? And those intel boys with their wimax are gonna get their pants beaten off.

    Seriously, how can anybody take this with more than a grain of salt?

  5. Awake says:

    This is one of those “I’ll believe it when I see it” technologies. Anytime someone promises a 1000x increase in anything for basically nothing, it is highly suspect. Leaps in technology in this massive scale do not happen just like that, they are evolutionary… so a 10X increase would be a reasonable technology announcement, but a 1000x increase is not.

    Think of Ethernet. It evolved to GigaBit etherenet, but in the process it went through 100Mb, 10 MB, 1.5Mb (was that the slowest?). But the point is… it evolved, it didn’t jump ‘reasonable’ generations.

  6. Eideard says:

    Uh, for the record, guys, the “slowest” of the Internet2 speed records is over 5 Gigabits/second. No one’s talking about incomprehensible speeds. These guys are a run-of-the-mill cable company in Spain talking about doing less than a quarter of that. The point is what isn’t being offered in the US.

    You can sign up for off-the-shelf IPTV in Hi-Def in Japan. Do you think that’s running on Baby Bell DSL-lite?

  7. Awake says:

    Eideard says: Uh, for the record, guys, the “slowest” of the Internet2 speed records is over 5 Gigabits/second.

    Yeah, but that is over specialized infrastructure, basically purely optical connections. What this announcement talks about is being able to upgrade a whole network for $100,000 so that the same infrastructure delivers Gbit performance to the home and over the air. Even if there was such a thing as 100Mb to the home, it certainly is a leap to get to 1000Mb without changing the whole underlying wiring infrastructure. Same thing for over the air transmission, the trend is just not there.

    I would like to see a real scientific paper published on this, not just some mumbo-jumbo announcement. We see far too many of those to believe in anything anymore… ie “The insurgency is on it’s last legs.”

  8. Eideard says:

    Awake. I posted this because it appears to be going where our sacrosanct providers don’t seem to be interested. If this is your area of expertise:

    http://www.ist-gandalf.org/index0.html

    There’s pages of stuff over there. Partners include both satellite and cable technology firms I recognized.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4532 access attempts in the last 7 days.