I was home for lunch and realized this was getting TV news “coverage”. Figured I’d better post something closer to reality.

“Our studies indicate that the trend that is the defining characteristic of human evolution–the growth of brain size and complexity–is likely still going on,” said lead researcher for both papers Bruce Lahn, PhD, assistant professor of human genetics at the University of Chicago and an investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. “Meanwhile, our environment and the skills we need to survive in it are changing faster then we ever imagined. I would expect the human brain, which has done well by us so far, will continue to adapt to those changes.”

Evolution, Lahn said, doesn’t occur at the species level. Rather, some individuals first acquire a specific genetic mutation; and because that variant confers on those who bear it a greater likelihood of survival, it then spreads in the population. “We’re seeing two examples of such a spread in progress,” he said. “In each case, it’s a spread of a new genetic variant in a gene that controls brain size. This variant is clearly favored by natural selection.”

In the two Science papers, the researchers looked at variations of microcephalin and ASPM within modern humans. They found evidence that the two genes have continued to evolve. For each gene, one class of variants has arisen recently and has been spreading rapidly because it is favored by selection. For microcephalin, the new variant class emerged about 37,000 years ago and now shows up in about 70 percent of present-day humans. For ASPM, the new variant class arose about 5,800 years ago and now shows up in approximately 30 percent of today’s humans. These time windows are extraordinarily short in evolutionary terms, indicating that the new variants were subject to very intense selection pressure that drove up their frequencies in a very brief period of time–both well after the emergence of modern humans about 200,000 years ago.

Each variant emerged around the same time as the advent of “cultural” behaviors. The microcephalin variant appears along with the emergence of such traits as art and music, religious practices, and sophisticated tool-making techniques–which date back to about 50,000 years ago. The ASPM variant coincides with the oldest-known civilization, Mesopotamia, which dates back to 7000 BC. “Microcephalin,” the authors wrote in one of the papers, “has continued its trend of adaptive evolution beyond the emergence of anatomically modern humans. If selection indeed acted on a brain-related phenotype, there could be several possibilities, including brain size, cognition, personality, motor control or susceptibility to neurological/psychiatric diseases.”

“The next step is to find out what biological difference imparted by this genetic difference causes selection to favor that variation over the others,” Lahn said.

The article is adapted from the original press release from UC here.



  1. Shane Ede says:

    I guess it doesn’t surprise me that this is happening. It is only natural that all species adapt to their surroundings and as a result, in some cases, we evolve because of that adaption.

  2. Ron Taylor says:

    Well we can only hope so.

  3. Angel H. Wong says:

    You do realise a paradox there don’t you? The ones with the higher education and income are having less and less children while the poor and uneducated are the ones having the kids.

    Also women are faring way better than men in academics, so one of my predictions is that we’re gonna end up in the future with white collared women and blue collared men. And that’s creepy because there’s no one so tyrannical as an anal female boss.

  4. GregAllen says:

    But I want _proof_ that the human brain is evolving! You certainly wouldn’t know it by watching TV

  5. Marvin says:

    I want proof from Angel Wong that men are becoming more blue-colored and women more white-colored. If so, the color barriers will break along exactly the same lines as the gender barriers. How will society cope with such a schizm? Are these blue-color genes somehow related to the microcephalin related genes that were studied by Lahn? Will affirmative action laws have to be tweaked to account for this phenomenon?

  6. Gary says:

    Marvin,

    Angel isn’t talking about the color of our skin, but rather the color of our shirt collars. White collared-workers (management) versus blue-collared workers (labor).

    What I find interesting is that the researchers assume that the variations they are finding are an increasing number of these genes. Where did they find a large enough sample of 37,000 year-old human genes to support their theory? I’m not a statistician; however, I do remember my statistics class where they warned us about making assumptions of general population statistics from too small a sample.

    This is the same type of reasoning scientists use when they talk about our heading toward or away from an ice age. They have proof that we’ve been in iceages before and they know we’re not in one now. However, they can’t tell if we’re headed toward one or away from one (theories of global warming not withstanding), they only know that we’re between them. The same thing applies here. They can tell that not everyone has the genes in question, but they don’t know if its becoming more common or less common, at least for the older of the two, microcephalin.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 5071 access attempts in the last 7 days.