Shi Yaowei, director of the tax department under the Ministry of Finance, said among China’s 24 categories of taxes, personal income tax is the most important one for adjusting social property allocation.
The past dozen years witnessed a constantly widening gap between the rich and poor in China. Nowadays, China’s Gini Coefficient (an internationally accepted measurement of income equality) has reached 0.447.
“According to the international accepted level, when a country’s Gini Coefficient is above 0.4, it means the country’s rich-and-poor gap is excessively wide,” said Shi.
The US Gini coefficient hit 0.4 in the 1970’s and hasn’t dropped below, since.
Statistics show that wage earners are China’s mainstream personal income tax payers. In 2004, China’s revenue from personal income taxes was 170 billion yuan (21 billion US dollars), 65 percent of which was collected from salaried workers. The phenomenon went against the fact that 20 percent of China’s population possess 80 percent of social wealth.
News coverage on CCTV9 gave me a chuckle when they included mention of a special category for movie stars.
Liu Huan, one of China’s tax experts, said that the 300 million wage earners have borne the country’s major tax burden. They seldom evade taxes because most of them have had only one income source, which is easy for tax authorities to inspect. Another reason is that, their work units or companies often withhold their taxes in advance before giving them salaries.
I wonder if anyone could write a tax code which isn’t boring stuff? I think dedication to the topic produces bean-counter genes?
Comparisons like these are naive and oversimplified. China and the United States are vastly different in political character, demographics, culture, geography, and natural resources.
I wonder: how many of those 300 million wage-earners are located in Hong Kong?
Also, what in blazes, is “Social Wealth”?? Sounds to me, like just another way of saying its OK to rob your neighbor, as long as a government official overseas the theivery.
Greg.
Focusing on income equality tends to make everyone equally poor.
I’d love to know what the US’s is.
The US Gini Coefficient has run between .4 to .48 the past thirty-five years.
The US is 76th of 127 countries.
Small list from Wikipedia:
Hungary: 0.244
Denmark: 0.247
Japan: 0.249
Sweden: 0.250
Germany: 0.283
India: 0.325
France: 0.327
Canada: 0.331
Australia: 0.352
UK: 0.360
Italy: 0.360
USA: 0.408
Singapore: 0.425
Thailand: 0.432
China: 0.447
Russia: 0.456
Guatemala: 0.483
Malaysia: 0.492
Hong Kong: 0.500
Mexico: 0.546
Chile: 0.571
Congo: 0.613
Namibia: 0.707
Fabrizio
If they’re smart they’ll pass the Flat Tax. They’re supposedly thinking about it. We should too, but that would put massive numbers of lobbyists, tax attorneys and accounts out of work–er, I mean “help the rich”–so it’ll never happen.