PHP 5.0 goes for Microsoft’s ASP-dot-Net jugular Here’s an outstanding article on PHP with a lot of links to other commentary. Followers of my columns will soon discover that I’m on this PHP bandwagon. It may be the most important phenomenon in the business today and threatens all sorts of vested interests.



  1. Fast eddy says:

    … primarily because Google and several other search engines fail to register php pages properly. So our site submissions using html continue to outrank those from our php using competitors.

    This is understandable as most dynamic web pages can (and are) succeptable to ongoing modifications, thus straying from the original intent and meaning of the title, keywords and descriptions. Example: It is quite common for porn pervayors to post seemingly legitimate dynamic pages, then get down and dirty after the search engine robots have come and gone.

    Dynamic pages have a huge advantage when it comes to web page maintenance, but in order to stay ahead of our competitors in ecommerce, we have to continue to use the more labor intensive static pages.

    FastEddy23

  2. Richard Pearlman says:

    PHP is for people enjoying playing with code. Commercial development requires .NET. Price is not any issue when serious applications are involved. The price of good programmers and maintenance make other pricing issues irrelevent. Even IBM knows that: that’s why they “give away” Linux.

    Is this aricle talking about Win2000 or Win2003. IIS6 is a different animal and the reviews make it the fastest server out there. Not to mention the control over memory caching.

    And please don’t mention Linux as an alternative. I do not want to get all my components from lots of sources. I want them integrated from one source, even if I am dependent on that one source.

    What you consider development I consider something of an experiemental situation, not commercial seriousness.

    Richard

  3. Jim Crow says:

    ZdWsJX The Jim Crow rules for the public bus system in Montgomery almost defy belief today. Black customers had to enter the bus at the front door, pay the fare, exit the front door and climb aboard again at the rear door. Even though the majority of bus passengers were black, the front four rows of seats were always reserved for white customers. Bennett wrote: “It was a common sight in those days to see Black men and women standing in silence and silent fury over the four empty seats reserved for whites.” Behind these seats was a middle section that blacks could use only if there was no white demand. However, if so much as one white customer needed a seat in this “no- man’s land,” all the blacks in that section had to move. Bennett concluded: “This was, as you can see, pure madness, and it caused no end of trouble and hard feeling.” In fact, Parks herself was once thrown off a bus for refusing to endure the charade of entry by the back door. In the year preceding Parks’s fateful ride, three other black women had been arrested for refusing to give their seats to white men. Still the system was firmly entrenched, and Parks would often walk to her home to spare herself the humiliation of the bus.

  4. diflulcan says:

    diflulcan…

    diflulcan…


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 5618 access attempts in the last 7 days.