Verizon Wireless has asked a federal court to overturn open-access rules that the U.S. Federal Communications Commission is imposing on the winner of valuable wireless airwaves to be auctioned this winter.
Verizon Wireless argued that the open-access conditions are unconstitutional, and the FCC overstepped its authority when it approved them on July 31…The auction is widely seen as a last opportunity for a new player to enter the wireless market.
The open-access rules have the support of Google, a potential bidder in the auction. They also have been endorsed by many consumer advocates, who say it is needed to spur competition in the wireless business.
I once paid to rid myself of Verizon several years back. One of the best investments I ever made.
Verizon reminds me of M$ on so many levels. Verizon knows that if 700 is open Google will step in and give them a run for their money. And just like M$, they will attempt to change the rules to keep themselves in the power seat. I would love nothing more then to see this greedy company with their retarded “can you hear me now” guy loose this one and maybe, just maybe change the half assed way cellular service is delivered in this country.
Well, I dunno. With exceptions for things like this, I’m very happy with Verizon. Of course I lived my entire life (less 1 year) with General Telephone before Verizon bought them out, so two dixie cups and a string would have been an improvement. I can’t imagine using a modem on the noise ridden lines were made to endure in the 1970s and 80s!
I’ve had 5 isps (Earthlink, AOL, the loop, Compuserve, actually, there were a couple more) over the years, and Verizon has been hands down the most reliable and had the best service. Though I don’t use them for cellular, everyone in the area that does seems to get better coverage than Cingular (now AT&T).
While I think they are wrong, I can’t really blame them for trying to make more $. Hopefully, the courts will straighten them and all the other corporate anti-free access folks out on this one. But it WILL go to the Supreme Court eventually. Bet on that.
Let me get this straight, a phone company known for cramming egregious and draconian terms down consumers’ throats is filing a lawsuit because it doesn’t like the reasonable and beneficial terms imposed against it?!
Oh the fricking irony!
I don’t get it. What is unconstitutional about the government selling its property with conditions attached? This will not affect the status of the other wavelengths currently in use.
Governments often sell property with conditions attached, such as real estate where the purchaser must erect a facility within a certain time frame. Or excess military material that may not be sold or transfered outside the US.
Currently the broadcasters using these wavelengths must allow receivers to use any equipment they prefer without restriction. They must also be answerable to the oversight of the FCC. Is Verizen going to give up those regulations if they purchase the spectrum?
Godwin’s Law before the first comment is posted. Nice.
I dumped Verizon for keeps a couple of months ago. Worst phone service I ever had. I now have phone, Internet and TV on the cable.
Ironic indeed
>>The auction is widely seen as a last opportunity for a new player to enter the wireless market
How is it unconstitutional for the government to prevent the formation of a cartel that can never be broken?
#2 – lol dude wtf yer crazy – verizon is the most evil fucking company ever – I know cuz Ive worked for em – not on the noob lvl of customer service but as a network technician –
I hope google buys the whole spectrum & then verizon can suck it
fuck verizon
How is it unconstitutional for the government to prevent the formation of a cartel that can never be broken?
Because Verizon says so! FYI, this is the same bonehead company that passed on the iphone because they couldn’t control every aspect of it.
WE “the people” are supposed to own the airwaves.They should be rented with a 30 year lease.Verizon is opening a can of worms here that may just bite the whole Telco business on the ass.God I hate those bastards.
Did you ever wonder why you, or your ISP, doesn’t have to pay long distance charges? I mean, we do communicate all over the world by long distance wiring etcetera, so why not?
I’m no expert but I’ve been told that during the early days of the Internet, ISPs quickly realized charging each other for long distance telecom was stupid because all the charges, back and forth, pretty much balanced out in the end and the entire process would end up being nothing but an expensive, meaningless bookkeeping exercise.
Apparently the same thing is true for voice but the telcos just couldn’t imagine not charging, so they pay each other back and forth, costing customers trillions of dollars for the exchange of nothing of value – nothing whatsoever.
If it’s not true, I’d be interested to know why I get a bill for telephone long distance but no direct charges whatsoever for Internet long distance.
I’m sure there must be a knowledgeable expert somewhere out there in DU land.
Everyone here has a choice: Use a cell phone as your home phone.
Hi. Sorry for my english. Happy New Year!!!!!
Good Luck!